Author image

Make vs. n8n: The Hidden Costs Behind Automation Tools

Visual comparison of Make vs. n8n automation tools with cost breakdown and call-to-action button.

When choosing between automation platforms like Make and n8n, most businesses start with one question: Which one costs less?

After helping a client evaluate both platforms for 5M+ yearly executions, we realized the real Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) goes far beyond monthly subscription fees. To make this decision easier for others, we compiled everything: cost breakdowns, feature comparisons, ROI scenarios etc. into a comprehensive downloadable PDF.

This insight could shift your perspective on how to evaluate the real value of automation tools.

Here’s a quick summary of what you’ll find inside:

📊 Topic 🔍 What You'll Learn
Cost Breakdown Real costs of Make vs n8n (self-hosted and cloud), including hidden technical costs
ROI Calculation Real business cases saving between €28K and €60K annually with Make
Setup & Maintenance Required effort for setup, upgrades, and infrastructure maintenance
Deployment Speed How quickly businesses can launch automations on each platform
Scenarios Comparison When each platform is more/less efficient (based on usage frequency and volume)
Security & Compliance What’s included in Make by default vs. what’s enterprise-only in n8n
Governance Features Identity management, audit logs, SSO, scalability insights
Productivity Metrics How Make accelerates time-to-value with visual UX and 2,400+ integrations
Feature Gaps in n8n What’s missing or delayed in the current roadmap (e.g., mailhooks, AI agents)

📄 Download the full report here

Make vs n8n: The Real Total Cost of Ownership Debate

Self-hosting n8n looks appealing at first, “free” software always does. But real-world use brings hidden costs: setting up and securing servers, hiring or dedicating DevOps resources, managing custom updates, and building missing integrations. Each adds friction and cost. For many businesses, that “free” platform quickly turns into an expensive infrastructure project.

With Make, things are a bit different. The setup is quick, done in under two hours. There is no need for ongoing maintenance or DevOps support. Everything just works. We have over 2,400 ready-made integrations at our fingertips, and the entire platform is intuitive enough for non-technical team members to build automations on their own. Security, compliance, and scalability? Already taken care of.

To help you get a clearer picture, we’ve extracted a portion of the key technical and operational differences between Make.com and n8n (self-hosted).

🔧 Feature Comparison Table

Feature Make.com n8n (Self-Hosted)
Pricing From $9/month (10K ops), Pro ~$16/mo, Enterprise ~€14K+/year Server: ~$10/mo, Setup & DevOps: ~€5K–60K+/year
Setup Time ~2 hours 10–20 hours + ongoing maintenance
DevOps Required ❌ No ✅ Yes (patches, scaling, monitoring)
App Integrations 2,400+ ready-made integrations ~350 community nodes (many unmaintained)

We’ve presented all the real numbers, from infrastructure costs to productivity gains, in the detailed document you can download here.

Makeitfuture 250 projects & partners & metrics about achievements

Case Snapshot: A Real Client Scenario

This client needed scalability, reliability, and ease-of-use. n8n’s initial setup looked doable, until they considered the DevOps hours required to maintain it, the risks of downtime, and the delay in launching new automations. They chose Make, and the numbers backed them up:

  • Setup completed in under 2 hours
  • No ongoing maintenance or DevOps support needed
  • Over €28,000 saved per year
  • Automations deployed 3× faster

Curious About the Full Report?
We’ve compiled all our findings: cost breakdowns, feature gaps, and detailed scenarios, including also our personal recommendation, in a downloadable PDF designed to help you make a smart automation investment.

📥 Get the full report here

Share this post
Get Started